There
are numerous fault zones in Oregon. A
graphical representation is available from the University
of Oregon. The information below about earthquake hazards in
Oregon is exerpted from an FAQ by the Oregon
Department of Geology and Mineral Industries.
Q: Is
there an earthquake hazard in Oregon?
A: YES!
There have been no "big" earthquakes in Oregon's brief
history, and there is no question that damaging earthquakes
have been far less frequent in Oregon than in California or
Washington. However, geologic research tells scientists that
Oregon will some day experience big earthquakes, and the Scotts
Mills earthquake of March 25, 1993, and the Klamath Falls earthquake
of September 20, 1993, confirm the research. Because we are
poorly prepared, the damage could be great. We are faced with
a small chance of a great disaster.
Q: What
about "The Big One"?
A: Geologic
research in the last few years has shown that Oregon and Washington
have probably been shaken by numerous subduction zone earthquakes
during the last several thousand years. Subduction zone earthquakes
occur when two great crustal plates slide past each other beneath
the coast of Oregon and Washington. These earthquakes occur,
on average, every 300-600 years, and the most recent was about
300 years ago. The subduction zone earthquakes were probably
centered just off the coast of Oregon and Washington and may
have been as large as magnitude 8 to magnitude 9. Such earthquakes
would cause significant shaking and damage in much of western
Oregon. Scientists cannot predict whether the next such event
might occur in two years or 200 years.
Q: What
parts of western Oregon are most dangerous?
A: Local
earthquakes are most common in the Portland metropolitan area,
northern Willamette Valley, and Klamath Falls area and may threaten
the coast from Coos Bay south to Brookings. We simply do not
know about the risk of local earthquakes in most other parts
of Western Oregon. All of Oregon west of the Cascades is at
risk from subduction-zone earthquakes. The amount of earthquake
damage at any place will depend on its distance from the epicenter,
local soil conditions, and types of construction.
Q: What
about faults?
A: To
date, no fault in western Oregon has been proven to be likely
to move in an earthquake. Although many faults have been identified,
we simply cannot say whether being near a fault is any more
hazardous than being far from one.