Information for:
Homeowners
Business Owners
Engineers/Scientists
Emergency Planners
 
CREW:
About CREW
Meetings
Join CREW
 
Products:
Cascadia Deep Earthquakes
Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes: A magnitude 9.0 earthquake scenario
Post-Disaster Recovery Guide: How to Guide
Just-in-Time Inventory: Effects on Earthquake Recovery
Using the CREW scenario: Three tabletop exercises
Business Survival Kit For Earthquakes & Other Disasters Video
Seattle Fault Scenario (CREW supporting EERI)
 

Earthquake Hazards in the Pacific Northwest



Earthquake Hazard Map used in the Uniform Building Code

The USGS compiles Earthquake hazard maps using the best available information, which is often imperfect. Building standards for several levels of shaking intensity are periodically proposed by the International Code Council (formerly the International Conference of Building Officials), and may be adopted into legislation. Hazards Maps Our knowlege of seismicity and the location of active faults in the Pacific Northwest is changing with time. This can be seen in the changes to the Uniform Building Code (UBC) seismic zones map that is used to prescribe standards for building construction (see International Code Council). The most up-to-date hazards maps reflect the most recent recognized characteristics of earthquakes on the Cascadia fault information on earthquake sources and amplification due to soils.


Expected Ground Motion from Future Earthquakes

Shown here is a custom map for Washington State. For the entire US, see the US Geological Survey's National Strong Motion pages (for Canadian building codes refer to the Geological Survey of Canada). The map portrays the level of ground shaking that can be reasonably expected to occur at a site in the next 50 years. It is based on knowledge of the rates of earthquake occurrence and the activity of faults in the region. The map is one of several types used to portray earthquake hazard.

The values shown on the map are "peak ground acceleration (PGA) in percent of g with 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years". Therefore, the map represents longer-term likelihood of ground accelerations. For example, values of 66% g can be expected in the Seattle area.

The force on a building during an earthquake is proportional to ground acceleration. Such forces are prescribed by the UBC. During an earthquake the ground acceleration varies with time. The acceleration values shown on the map are the peak or maximum values expected during the earthquake. "g" is a common value of acceleration equal to 9.8 m/sec/sec (the acceleration due to gravity at the surface of the earth). 30% of g is the acceleration one would experience in a car that takes 9 seconds to brake from 60 miles per hour to a complete stop.

The "2% probability of exceedance in 50 years" refers to the fact that earthquakes are somewhat random in occurrence. One can not predict exactly whether an earthquake of a given size will or will not occur in the next 50 years. The map takes the random nature of earthquakes into account. It was constructed so that there is a 2% chance (2 chances in 100) that the the ground acceleration values shown on the map will be exceeded in a 50 year time period.


Ground Acceleration versus Damage

The degree of ground shaking (or damage) caused by an earthquake is often assigned a numerical value from Roman numeral I to XII on the Modified Mercalli (MM) Scale. The value is determined from interviews with people who felt the earthquake and from damage reports. Damage at a site depends on many factors such as the size of the earthquake, distance to the epicenter, soil conditions at a site, and type of building construction. The damage reports can be used to construct a MM intensity or "isoseismal" map. Because of ambiguities and interpretation, isoseismal maps of historic earthquakes can vary somewhat as in early studies of the 1872 earthquake, long thought to be in the North Cascades, but now believed to be near Entiat

Engineers prefer a measure of ground shaking that is more objective than MM intensity such as an instrumental measurement of ground acceleration via a strong motion seismograph. Since about 2000, the USGS has funded the installation of networks of strong motion accelerographs in urban areas, and created "ShakeMap", a product that combines instrumental measurements of acceleration information about geology and soils to provide an intesity map of the affected area. The relationship between MM intensity and acceleration, determined by empirical observation, is included in the table below.


Modified Mercalli Intensity (abbreviated description)

The approximate values of acceleration shown are not part of the definition of MM intensity. The values are from a ShakeMap subpage - About ShakeMap, and are based on empirical correlations of measured and perceived shaking.
MM
Intensity
Accel.
%g
Description of Intensity Level
I <0.17 Not felt except by a very few under especially favorable circumstances.
II 0.17-1.4 Felt only by a few persons at rest, especially on upper floors of buildings. Delicately suspended objects may swing.
III 0.17-1.4 Felt quite noticeably by persons indoors, especially on upper floors of buildings. Many people do not recognize it as an earthquake. Standing motor cars may rock slightly. Vibration similar to the passing of a truck. Duration estimated.
IV 1.4-3.9 Felt indoors by many, outdoors by few during the day. At night, some awakened. Dishes, windows, doors disturbed; walls make cracking sound. Sensation like heavy truck striking building. Standing motor cars rocked noticeably.
V 3.9-9.2 Felt by nearly everyone; many awakened. Some dishes, windows broken. Unstable objects overturned. Pendulum clocks may stop.
VI 9.2-18 Felt by all; many frightened. Some heavy furniture moved; a few instances of fallen plaster. Damage slight.
VII 18-34 Damage negligible in building of good design and construction; slight to moderate in well-built ordinary structures; considerable damage in poorly built or badly designed structures; some chimneys broken. Noticed by persons driving motor cars.
VIII 34-65 Damage slight in specially designed structures; considerable in ordinary substantial buildings with partial collapse. Damage great in poorly built structures. Fall of chimneys, factory stacks, columns, monuments, walls. Heavy furniture overturned.
IX 65-124 Damage considerable in specially designed structures; well-designed frame structures thrown out of plumb. Damage great in substantial buildings, with partial collapse. Buildings shifted off foundations.
X 124 Some well-built wooden structures destroyed; most masonry and frame structures destroyed with foundations. Rails bent.
XI >124 Few, if any (masonry) structures remain standing. Bridges destroyed. Rails bent greatly.
XII - Damage total. Lines of sight and level distorted. Objects thrown into the air.

Ground shaking is perceptible to humans if the acceleration exceeds 1/10 of 1% g. Structural damage in buildings not designed to be resistant usually occurs at 10% g. Accelerations caused by earthquakes have been recorded exceeding 100% g. Factors other than acceleration must also be considered in evaluating the causes of damage such as the oscillation frequency and the total duration of shaking. For example, tall buildings are most affected by low frequency ground motions while typical family residences are most affected by high frequency motions.


Prepared by Prof. Anthony Qamar , Geophysics, University of Washington. Edited and amended by Ruth Ludwin 1/2008